When society was formed, certain essential conditions were established. The foremost among them was that individual values should be preserved while ensuring the welfare of society as a whole. Over time, the renowned philosopher Jeremy Bentham articulated this principle as "The greatest happiness for the greatest number," which became one of the fundamental doctrines of modern law. However, even this concept had its limitations.
In India, the framers of the Constitution recognized freedom of expression as a fundamental right under Article 19(1), but they also imposed reasonable restrictions under Article 19(2). One of these restrictions was in the interest of "decency and morality." Later, the "Doctrine of Contemporary Community Standards" emerged, but courts worldwide have never entirely removed the fundamental restrictions on morality.
No form of expression that stifles the collective consciousness of society can be deemed acceptable under the guise of personal liberty. Journalists and citizens were granted this freedom to facilitate the exchange of ideas and improve public opinion, but the state retains the authority to define the boundaries of public interest.
Today, the accessibility and affordability of internet and social media technologies have significantly expanded the scope of free expression. However, this has also led to its rampant misuse. Vulgar and misleading content has become a serious threat to society. The argument that "this is what people want to watch and listen to" only reflects a lack of understanding of law, justice, and ethics.
Particularly, YouTubers and social media influencers must recognize their social responsibility. Their expressions shape public perception and mindset, so they must ensure that their content does not harm the moral and cultural values of society. Freedom is not just a right; it is also a duty. If it is not exercised responsibly, there is a risk of chaos prevailing in society.